But in this case I would prefer a bit more consistent: nomiate and vote what ever the several "pressure groups" here likes to see as their AOM in your "anonymous committees". >This would be at least a bit more honest and a bit more comprehensible for me. i am sorry i don't quite understand what you mean. i am very open to suggestions and truly am looking for a way to satisfy as many members as possible. just not following what you mean. thanks audre