The only difference I see there is that one points to the free area and one to the subscription area. I only half heartedly agree with this catagorization. Once again I bring up the fact that if there is something behind a subscription site that someone asks about I am no longer going to be able to tell them where it is because they will have to pay to get it. This comes down to simply saying "If it isn't free we don't want it posted here in the common forums. Unless of course it is one of our approved sites." The approved sites being UVMApper, Soft-rabbit and Daz currently. This is extremly strange on how this choice was made. Is it only the big guys? No, UVMapper isn't a big player. Is it only the little guys? No, Daz is a very large company. Is it just those that won't compete in products? No, Daz offers products that would compete with anything here. Is it only those sites that someone has some form of tie to or doesn't want to piss off? This is the only one I can't say no to. PWFW falls inside the allowable sites based off of that list with the exception of the last question. So I want to ask, who made this list of allowable sites and what were the criteria?