I beg to differ based off of the following quote: "Posting a link to www.uvmapper.com or www.daz3d.com is fine and so is www.soft-rabbit.com, but no direct links to e-commerce or subscription pages." Isn't Daz an e-commerce site? I know soft-rabbit is totally free with nothing sold there, so that fits. uvmapper.com is starting to grey this line. Does he not sell the pro version from his site? So based off of the inclusion of DAZ being allowed how can you say that there is no allowable list when one was given here? Granted I only see one item in that list that goes against the e-commerce rule fully. With this I have to ask again who made this list of allowable sites and by what criteria? I can understand soft-rabbit, uvmapper is a little grey but I can accept it, but Daz is a full e-commerce site. Maybe one item doesn't make a list, and with that you would be correct when you say there is no list. But that would lead to another question as to why one e-commerce site but not another? You see, I'm just asking for an explaination of the criteria and everytime I ask this I never get an answer.