buckrogers opened this issue on Feb 03, 2000 ยท 10 posts
nicknoel posted Thu, 03 February 2000 at 8:51 PM
That sounds like a good idea, but it would be nicer to have as many as the user wants, even in the current format. Instead of just 12 a page, why not 20? or 50? or 100? I mean, the 12 is good if you have a slow connection and graphics are slow, but if you have a fast computer and a fast connection, then why not as many as you like? I have seen other sites where they ask how many entries per page you want. The list would make it easier and would probably be easier to impliment. It it's kinda like the PFOs last system of posting, you had the title and the author, but had a choice of either downloading it or going to a full description and then downloading it.