"To be on the safe side, the debate will likely end in not allowing any image that even brushed close to that code."

Right, even though the law was overturned, when the new one is instituted (I shudder at the thought), I wouldn't be surprised if the policy here was a "no nonsense" sort of policy that immediately gets anything that even LOOKS like it may have a nude "child" in it deleted.

If that's the case, and I hope it's not because I like to think the admins aren't that crazy, I can see problems with having Vicki in an image naked. Who is to say how "old" she is? And it's been mentioned before, but as soon as you use one of the smaller breast dials, you're inviting yourself into interpretation that she's young. Granted, not all of the time, but does anyone see where I'm going?

We're going to need clearly defined rules (not that I think we're not responsible enough, but it's a requirement to cover their behinds, I think), and I hope they don't go overboard. The last thing we need is to start deleting images of faeries. Oops, wait, that's already happened.