I think what the Supreme Court actually ruled in the first place was that nudity wasn't obscene. Then, the prosecutors got around that in the case of children because the state has an overriding duty to protect the children involved. Then...recently...the Supreme Court said that was ok...but that since no real children are involved in these images, they are ok, because the state has no burden of protection for digitally created characters. And I believe that's where it stands now. Beav