Hey Spike, Taken from a previous post here: "No nude artwork, animations or photographs of children under the age of 18 will be allowed anywhere on the site, however, artwork showing babies in a non sexual setting will be allowed, provided there is no showing of genitalia." I tyhink this would fit the bill with one exc exception. You can't say under the age of 18 because digital models do not have an age. You would have to say something to the effect of, "Under the apparent physical age of 18." This would at least clear it up and cover the recent deletions. Now this doesn't mean I agree with the limitation, but it would at least state it. This way we would know that any image, regardless of content, depicting what appears to be a youthfull figure will be removed. Now just so people don't get to up in arms about it, why not say something like this: "No nude artwork, animations or photographs of children under the age of 18 with genitals, buttocks or breasts exposed will be allowed anywhere on the site." This could allow us to show a nude image of a child as long as those parts considered by some to be obcene are obscured. We could show it as long as there are leaves, cloth, or cropping done to hide these areas. It would still allow us to express our visions, and yet still give a clear line that we can not cross. So what do you say?