QUOTE:
"Depictions of such youngsters must also avoid erotic, seductive, provocative poses or context."

I understand that you are trying to be fair and make rules that are clear, but you have just shuffled it all off onto the realm of the MOST subjective thing imaginable, thereby guaranteeing that this argument is FAR from over and there will be even MORE hard feelings in the future. This also guarantees that only the ones with the sickest, most depraved interpretations of any image will end up with the final word, because everytime they see anything that tickles their libido they will pounce on it as pornography. That is pathetic.

Acording to the quoted statement, this image could be construed as violating the TOS, as was prophetically noted yesterday by member Namja1955, who has graciously removed his comment at my request:

http://www.renderosity.com/viewed.ez?galleryid=184075

Haha! See y'all in the funny papers!

=};-}>