I'm glad this worked out!

For future reference though, does this mean that the TOS will be altered to reflect that:

Artwork that includes common mythical creatures (such as fairies, pixies, or cupids that are traditionally represented as having a more youthful appearance in Western Art) will not be considered inappropriate under the "child pornography clause" as long as there is CLEAR indications that these are said creatures - in other words, their pointed ears and/or wings are unquestionably visible.

I ask this not to beat a dead horse but to prevent future re-occurance. As I said before, I don't envy the Mods - they have to walk a fine line and no doubt it's quite uncomfortable at times. If we clarify this in writing (and yes, I know some of you will say, "Oh no, more rules") it may make it easier in the future.

Child pornography is EVIL. Pixies and fairies are just a little mischevious.

Before they made me they broke the mold!
http://home.roadrunner.com/~kflach/