I personally think it is time to stop listening to the few that complain and start taking a leaf out of the famous artists' books. If it is good enough for them to have their work officially published then why can't we create the same without this backlash from those prudes that troll the place? I still stand by my original statement that the owner should just say "This is my site and this is what I allow. If you don't like it, go elsewhere or don't view it." Example: I come into your home and discover that you have the place plastered with Elvis images everywhere. (for the sake of this argument...) I don't like Elvis and start demanding that you take it down so I won't be offended. What do you do? If it was me, I would say "Tough!! This is my house> You don't like it, you can leave anytime and not come back or tolerate it and enjoy your visit with me." But I do agree with the ruling that if the image has nudity but the nudity flag has not been checked then the image is removed with and email sent to the artist telling them why it was removed but they can put the image back up as long as they check the nudity check box.