hello again, just want to clarify a point that seems to be mis-interpreted by most folks... and here i will quote something i posted in a thread recently: an image that violates the TOS in the galleries is in no way tacit approval by the staff or management of Renderosity -- as is often inferred by members when they see such things. the ONLY reason that an image remains in the gallery that violates our TOS is that we are not aware of it at that time. also, we don't judge an image, it's message, or the member posting. we look at the RULES that are in place for this community and that is what we enforce, to the best of our ability. not everyone agrees with the decisions and on occasion, the group of mods may make a decision which the vocal part of the community has a problem with. we review these things on a case-by-case basis and act according to what we feel represents the TOS the best. as we find images that are 'iffy' or an image is brought to our attention, we compare the image to the TOS guidelines. if the group decides it's over the line, it goes. if there is enough of a doubt, we leave it. to address your question about your particular image, we concluded that one of the women in your image had genitalia that was decidedly pinker than the rest of her. and her privates looked rather swollen, so the implication was that she was aroused, (well, either that or she has an extremely painful case of hemorrhoids, which i don't think is the case here). thanks audre editor, renderosity magazine >> so you see.. it is appearence even on a female character. The piece in question, the character on the left is about to walk away (standing) remorsefully. Between her legs is a tiny bit of "pink" where it SHOULD be.. that was the issue. Is the pink swollen or not? Thus I ask are we going to ask ourselves "are the nipples firm or do they just look firm? Is she aroused or was there a wind? Is she cold?"