I think the whole rating system is so overvalued that it is largely worthless- sort of like the EM rating system in the Air Force (at least in the late 60s), where anything less the 4.0 mean the guy is worthless. I suggest we try to come up with a better system, maybe rate separatly on artistic and techical content, on maybe a 0 - 10 basis, and reserve the highest scores for exceptional, outstanding work.