Jack D. Kammerer opened this issue on Feb 16, 2000 ยท 33 posts
casamerica posted Wed, 16 February 2000 at 1:56 PM
I might consider Win2000 after they kill a few of the 65000+ bugs Microsoft has confirmed exists in it. Yes, 65000+ CONFIRMED bugs. Sorry, Microsoft does not call them "bugs". They are "issues." I might consider 2000 after they fix the network security holes Microsoft has confirmed exists. And I might consider 2000 if they can ever prove they ever got Win3.x, Win95 or Win98 stable. This is one reason I try not to blame the developers of software for the Win OS. They follow the rules and "lay of the land" as given to them by Microsoft. Now, if those rules and "lay of the land" are unstable, nothing they do will guarantee that their project is going to be stable. If you want to go insane, try programming with Microsoft's Visual Studio. It is why I am the way I am. Tragic, truly tragic.