It's not the lack of clothing I'm lampooning; it's the lack of quality. Took me two afternoons to make (keeping in mind I multitask like an octopus with MPD, which means I have 3 unrelated programs open at the same time). It's all canned stuff. Daz's free lo-res textures, free sword download, canned poses, practically canned face, and the only hint of postwork is putting on my signature. It's crap; it was made to be crap. I've even got the awful elbow joint and icky weird shadows under the breast featured in the thumbnail. "Odalisque" shown above is obviously MUCH better quality, but at just over 24 hours for myself, AYSIHTBNFT? has 415 hits, contrasted with Odalisque's 455. That's only an 8% difference between obvious hard work and obvious crap! I'm sorry, but I find this amusing. You're welcome to be counter-amused by the fact that I'll click on almost anything with a cat in the thumbnail (I adore kitties). As for enjoying pictures of naked women, remember this from the list of differences between men and women: "Men's magazines are filled with pictures of naked women. Women's magazines... are filled with pictures of half-naked women. This is because the female body is a work of art, while the male body is hairy and lumpy and should never be seen by the light of day." ^_~ (JK. There are many male bodies that should DEFINITELY be seen by the light of day. : ) )