Forum: Poser - OFFICIAL


Subject: Well, that didn't take long

FyreSpiryt opened this issue on Jun 20, 2002 ยท 28 posts


kbade posted Thu, 20 June 2002 at 9:44 PM

I generally agree with FyreSpirit's take on the aesthetics of the female form versus the male. I am less sure that the lack of clothing is entirely unrelated to the lack of quality. A Poser image of a clothed figure will only magnify or multiply many of the flaws FyreSpirit correctly identifies in low quality images; a good image of a clothed figure will generally require post-work. And I write this as someone who is admittedly lacking in post-work skills. Of course, I also agree with many of the other comments here to the extent that the ability to render semi-realistic (or intentionally unrealistic) nudes (esp. women) may well be a motivating factor for some to buy Poser in the first instance. It was certainly no accident on the part of CL/DAZ (and their predecessors) that some of the models have lacked genitalia;-)