If Bryce 6 won't run properly under my Windows 98, and the later operating systems are unreliable, I better stick to my Bryce 5. My policy with PC operating systems is to be one upgrade behind the latest, to give time for the bugs to be got out of it. Or is it s trick to force people to keep on buying more new operating systems for their computers? It is the same as that, to write Windows programs, I stick to my out-of-date Borland C++ 4.52, because later versions such as Borland C++ 5 that I have tried, have major weird faults.