Mason opened this issue on Jun 26, 2002 ยท 32 posts
ChuckEvans posted Wed, 26 June 2002 at 2:25 PM
It's also another attempt to fool the masses. Typical of legislative electives who can now run home and boast to thier Nebraskan (pardon the example) constituants that THEY passed another bill to stop child pornography. The average person living in "fill in the blank state name" has no idea what Poser (or similar products) are, will never read the words of the law, yet will get outraged when the Supreme Court strikes down this second attempt. And the representative of these people will still be held in high esteem because s/he tried. I'm outraged, not because I make pictures that will be suspect (well, not with THIS law, anyway), but because of the principle involved. Just because the courts might not be able to distinquish between a real photo and a CGI, those found with CGI will automatically be lumped in with those posessing child pornography and assumed guilty. And, as outrage goes, I find it maddening that ths is going on at the same time there are so many Catholic pedophiles and so little concern by the US or the Catholic "rulers".