Mason opened this issue on Jun 26, 2002 ยท 32 posts
rtamesis posted Wed, 26 June 2002 at 6:40 PM
Child pornagraphy doesn't have to show pictures of children (whether real or not) engaging in sex. If it's a picture of a partially clothed or nude figure that looks like a child or a young teenager below the age of consent, any puritan worth his or her salt will make a case that it's child porn since pedophiles will collect pictures of young people in various degrees of undress and let their prurient imaginations do the rest.