Mason opened this issue on Jun 26, 2002 ยท 32 posts
terminusnord posted Wed, 26 June 2002 at 10:12 PM
I personally find CGI kiddy porn as distasteful as the real thing, but there's a huge difference between making distasteful animations and perpetrating an actual sexual crime against minors. Making child pornography exploits and harms the children (the 'actors'). This is why it's bad. You can't sexually molest an .obj file. Computer renderings are just a form of art/animation. If you are going to allow your lawmakers to ban CGI porn, then illustrated porn is next. Pretty soon, it will be a federal crime to sketch two children having sex, or to write a story about it. then, you will truly have the 1984 vision realised. Good luck to any of you that take the initiative to fight against these laws and keep artistic freedom free. -Adam