ronknights opened this issue on Jul 09, 2002 ยท 30 posts
ronknights posted Wed, 10 July 2002 at 10:28 PM
RoyG, what is the sense of creating a new character with her own unique face and body if we're just going to take that body away from her so she can wear Vicky's clothes? To me that's the biggest fallacy of this whole situation. And apparently "the majority" of clothing artists buy this line of reasoning. So if Stephanie really wants to be herself, she'll need to be naked. Well it looks like Jim was kind enough to take "the stock Stephanie" into consideration. It's too bad I'm not able to spring for the money to buy another character. Thanks anyway Jim. I just love your work. Ron