Hammer2002 did give a critique to Majikku's Angel story, so we now have a sample of his critiquing style. crisjon1950 - I think that your first statement to Hammer2002 came off a bit rough: Constructive Criticism is a key concept here. It's hard to tell if the Hammer believes in Constructive Criticism. To me, that statement could be interpreted as: "Does Hammer2002 actually want to be constructive in his criticism?" From your most recent post, I don't think that's what you meant. This misinterpretation actually ties in to Hammer2002's dilemna, which is making sure that what is said/written is interpreted as intended. Cheers!