"If people continually express their negative opinion concerning freebie artists who have restrictions against commercial use, they are basically stating that they want it all for nothing, and are very selfish."

Look at the people posting opinions on this Ron. They are also freestuff providers but they don't restrict their stuff. Am I selfish for allowing commercial use and wishing others would consider it too? You have no right to project what you think people are "basically saying" into this.

You also seem to be speaking for a very large number of people. Most of whom, I'm sure, would rather you not place yourself in the position of their spokesperson.

"The very existence of this thread is the problem, not my attitude toward the negative attitudes expressed here."

This thread started as someone going through a gallery with a fine tooth comb and jumping to conclusions. It led to the discussion on the fact that not all free stuff is restricted and the person should have realized that before jumping on someone.

It also could have been very productive if it weren't for people like you putting words in the mouths of every freestuff contributor out there. (you definitely don't speak for me)
Fyrespiryt's comments for example. She has legitimate, personal reasons for controlling her offers and in this discussion a lot of people learned (and hopefully understood) why. That's what I mean by "productive".

You're the only one stating absolutes and demands here, Ron.

"You take what you get and like it or don't take it."

Why didn't you take that advice when the issue of Daz protecting their morphs came up? You certainly seemed to feel entitled to your disagreement with them over that issue. Why don't you feel that others are entitled to the same type of discussion on this issue?

...... Kendra