In any case, the tester's response to a query about incorrect files led to the tester accusing the buyer of stealing ... something. Whether he's demanding proof of a legal Poser/ProPack or proof of purchase for the product with the error is only part of the problem. He responds to a question by accusing the member -- who also happens to be a merchant -- of theft in public. A snide "You first have to have a real copy", followed by instructions to send proof to a private AOL address from a product tester is totally out of line. It's not the tester's place or problem to turn into Nancy Drew and find criminals around every corner. He accused publicly, and I'm hoping for his sake that he responds in kind with a public apology for his reaction. As to what Renderosity does about his demands, that's up to Clint. We'll see.