I don't see the problem here with either the vendor or the user of the product. My best wishes all of them. The vendor has found a way to create a product that is useful to alot of obviously happy people, who in turn feel better about their final creation. Why would you possibly want to tear that down and knock these people? Many in this community (myself included) don't even consider ourselves to be artists, but hobbyists. We enjoy feeling a part of a group of people who really are artists capable of producing genuinely good work such as the examples shown by Thip, and having the opportunity to communicate with them. No delusions of immortal greatness or historical significance with my work for sure.
The goal of improving software is ultimately to provide better results for the user, and I, as one who will not ever posess any natural CG gift, appreciate it. I know people who don't even consider any creation generated on a computer to even BE art; but would claim that a torched bicycle rewelded into a contorted configuration is. Without people like us Tisa, you wouldn't have the yardstick you need against which you need to measure your obvious brilliance.