Well, brycetech, I'd hate to have your electric bill. *8-) I thank many of you for your statements. I guess the problem I have with the article is that the author contends the opposite of what many of you have said. He states that CL "owns all poses that can be produced by their software." That is quite a statement. Many of you say that CL's EULA states that poses can't be copyrighted; but is owning them and copyrighting them necessarily the same? BTW, the above quote is from Renderosity Issue 3 (C) 2002 Bondware Inc. and is used for review and discussion purposes only. 8)