My opinion is I'd have rather seen none at all. Sorry but I'm one of those consumers who feel it is wrong for a company to release a product that they know doesn't work properly. I can understand software being unknowingly released with bug that a company has to fix. I could probably let slide a company releasing a product with a minor bug if it didn't effect the functionality of the product in a major way. But to release P5 knowing it had bugs. Some of which can not only make the program almost impossible to work with in some circumstances and in others out right crashes the machine? Uh-huh. Thats just poor business practice. I'm one of the lucky one for whom P5 works enough that I can get some use out of it with 'workarounds' but what about those who can't use it or don't want to resort to work arounds? They got a nice paperweight on their desk. Heck one of the 'fixes' I use to make P5 work better, makes the rest of my Windows GUI difficult to use. And I'm not blaming the beta testers, mostly cause they have no say so on bug fixes anyway. The fault lays at CL's feet for this debacle. Now I just hope they fix it in the 'patch'.