wolf359 opened this issue on Sep 24, 2002 ยท 109 posts
wolf359 posted Tue, 24 September 2002 at 5:11 PM
"Yes, this thread was a troll post IMO. Next time I'm sending a warning. -Jeff" A warning for what??? as the person who started the thread I must protest your assement of my intentions. Im trying to understand how one identical peice of software can perform so badly on some peoples powerful hardware/OS and "run smoothly" on others. Im VERY Suspicious that many of these alleged "bugs" might be Due to the Disparate and broadly varying Low cost PC configurations that are running the new release I thought some of the beta tester might want to share their hardware/OS specs and the thread quickly descended into an exchange of insults between CL loyalist and former "california dreamers" who are outraged at being left in the california dessert By a company that Has publicly admitted to releasing a poorly contructed software package and letting the bodies hit the floor. And by the way PHILC has publicly admitted to being a beta tester for the original propack4 yet i dont see this fear of exposing him to the Ire of dissatisfied buyers of that package which was patched into a decent app with three service releases. and signing a N.D.A. means you will not discuss specific features of your beta software BEFORE its release, it does not put you in some lifelong witness protection program after its released so if you are going to warn someone warn the people who are violating the TOS with profanity etc not those of use who ask legitimate question about subject some people apparently consider hush hush.