LOL - I agree with you, Orio. Case in point - look at the latest entry in my own gallery... it took roughly three hours to pull off total (honest!), including 30 minutes of that rendering in Firefly. However, I made a semi-provocative (okay, downright misleading) thumbnail with the word "NAKED" prominent in the title (though in reality the lass has all her clothes on... she's only thinking about "getting naked in the woods" ;) ) I racked up more viewings with that image in two days than I had with any other image in my wee gallery, with exception of my first (coincidentally, my first image also has the word "naked" prominent in the title as well, but no thumbnail.) At last check, my first image has 667 viewings since January, and my two-day-old experiment has 564 viewings. The least viewed item in the pile is based on Mike... (go figure.) I think I may have set a record for the most viewings of a fully clothed non-pinup Vicky ever posted... cool; I never thought that tweaking demographics could be so much fun :p Now, to answer the original thread question? A small, non-significant amount of post-work would be cool (my experiment has exactly one small bit of it... the grass by her left toes to help blend her in a touch came from post-working in the GIMP.) OTOH, a ton of post-worked effects and such really IMVHO belongs in mixed-media, or eprhaps its own "Poser unlimited" group. IMHO, there really ought to be a "100% Poser" gallery with unpost-worked Poser renderings and nothing else in it. If nothing else, it would help cut down on the flood a touch :) /P