I'm with Mab on this. I think Crescent's explanation is entirely plausible and fits within the scenario that "tagging" was applied to. The accused in this case had been "spraying grafitti" across several threads, marking several Poser 5 related threads with his opinion on the software. Not entirely sure that it warranted a warning because it is his opinion and while he has been militant posting complaints he's not been insulting nor has he attacked anybody nor has he really been particularly controversial. But, yep... he did hit several threads and add to them with a post that was likely to get a response. I like Crescent's explanation it makes sense. I'm also inclined to think that the other moderator in this was heavy handed and unnecessarily vague and off-hand about clearing the confusion - probably didn't know what it mean it just sounded cool. He read it in mod forum once maybe. :)