"In this case the member in question was "tagging" threads concerning poser 5. Not replying to them in a legitimate way, but spamming them." Uhm, so now the staff will be deciding what comments are "legitimate"? So by that definition anytime a thread is potentially taken off it's original subject it is "tagging" "But, again, this is a private site, so any cries of "censorship" won't work. The owners can allow what they want (or delete what they don't like) at their own discretion. " So true, it's just frustrating when these things aren't in the TOS and that same TOS is used like a battering ram to beat someone into line. But if you don't like the unspoken rules one can always leave or take a hiatus - maybe by the time you come back they will have decided exactly what they are against/for. BTW - I wonder did any other mods know the meaning of this or that it was a violation - or did a certain someone simply have a snit fit and decide it annoyed him so he should make it a violation on his own? Was it discussed prior to it happening as a problem and violation?

3-D Arena | Instagram | Facebook

I do not feel obliged to believe that the same God who has endowed us with sense, reason, and intellect has intended us to forgo their use.
-Galileo