Just rockin the boat a little here. 3D is often compared with photo (as its closest relative). Imagine the Poser gallery (or any other 3D gallery) as a photo gallery, how many of you would then define your "photos" as art? Thinkin in those terms changes things a little bit for me when I browse any 3D art gallery. So what is it that makes it art? That it is purely made on a computer? It cant be that since... "I really don't see what the issues are... Since when did we start evaluating the validity of art, or the artform, by the tools we use?" What defines it then?