As this issue has been raised and discussed ad nauseam over the past two months, I will not restate my position and the reasons behind it. However, I would like to ask the proponents of "protection schemes" to back up their statements with verifiable facts from unbiased sources. To date, I have not seen anything remotely suggesting the claims made, perhaps I am looking in the wrong spots? So far, the majority of the "facts" surrounding "protection schemes" have come from those who directly benefit from its use. To me, that is hardly an objective and unbiased source to base factual information upon.