Back again! :-) I'd also like to indicate that criticism of the model provider's "must not" clause is in no way a personal attack, nor is it indicative of a lack of appreciation. I'm very appreciative, very, of freestuff providers. There ahve been several times that I've IM'd providers with thanks. If the provider of the column finds this thread, they probably won't like much of what they read, but perhaps they can think about less provocative or more specific ways of requesting that items not be used in certain ways. Ultimately, what Stormrage said so succinctly is correct. Some of the "amateur lawyers" need to realize that they're expressing their opinions as if they're law. Big difference.