nandus opened this issue on Nov 08, 2002 ยท 42 posts
shadowdragonlord posted Mon, 11 November 2002 at 12:48 PM
(laughs at Rayraz, again!) Methinks if you're gonna list off Lightwave's features word-for-word, perhaps you should just use Lightwave? (grins) Or, maybe just convert the top-bar of your Lightwave to say "Bryce Pro", and then you'd be happy? I suck at LW, I've been playing with it for months and still haven't made a single image worth posting, anywhere. I wouldn't even e-mail one of my pathetic attempts to my own dear mum. Even a million dollars worth of software won't make me into another Monet or Rembrandt. I love new tools as much as the next power-hungry, ego-based monkey! But it's all about the art, here, not the technical precision. It's like you have a $40 sable watercolor brush and you're comparing it to a $4,000 dragon-nose-hair oil brush! If you want the power of the dragon-nose, go use it, it already exists. And if Bryce "6" had all of the same features, exactly, as LW, that would be pure copyright infringement, and Corel would go down even faster... Save the DRAGON-NOSES! Make more art! Even some of the greatest artists in the world use crappy brushes some of the time, and the weird part is you can't even tell when they're done!