That's cool :) Your (as anyone is) welcome to make your own judgments. Of course, what I am finding interesting is the concept of bias in "all things Poser". I don't see it as a bias. I see it as honesty. * If you look up my position on WindowsXP registration you will see it is exactly the same (I poseted here on R'osity about it) and I CERTAINLY don't make any money from MS and that was before Poser5 existed :) * The software one is simple - I was part of the beta test and we simply did not see many of the bugs that were found "in the wild". This was verified by others - so I am unsure how it shows bias. * The EULA - if you'll note I had a COW about similar issues with Daz and was eventually happy with their offer to grant legal documentation of compliance to those vendors who needed it - this was WAY before the Poser5 issue. It is only honest and consistent that I suggest that as the answer to the Poser5 problem - since it was the SAME problem I had spend a month arguing. In other words - what seems to be bias in my opinions is actually consistent with my opinions before Poser5 existed on similar topics. Hopefully consistency isn't a bad thing :) All things considered I can't imagine it would be worth me sacraficing all my opinions for the little bit of revanue that I MIGHT get from a product or two on CP when we offer them for sale - especially since I could offer the same products on R'osity (actually PoserPros) without CP ... so I guess I am missing what the motive would be. Anyway - thanks for the thread and for keeping it all polite :) P.S. Sorry for the delay in my reply, crushing deadlines here.