Well, hopefully my remark about "deep meaning" won't be taken differently than I meant it. Personally speaking, I think (thinking in broad terms) art comes in two forms (and I'm sure, more): Pleasing to the eye. Boris' art doesn't have deep meaning. But it's always colorful and imaginative and beautiful. Meaning? Not much. Other than, perhaps, his interpretation of a myth or something. Meaningful (or "deep"). Something that causes someone to think. I would point you to a thread in the photography gallery on photojournalism. Or (God forbid) to my gallery for "Leftover Death" or "Tween Tricks". Where I tried to convey a meaning. When I mentioned Tisa's pieces in her gallery, I didn't see "deep meaning" in the way I interpret it. Doesn't mean it isn't art. Just that it seems to me that what she posts doesn't try to convey any particular meaning. Except for the one we are discussing.