Cheers opened this issue on Dec 07, 2002 ยท 15 posts
tasquah posted Sat, 07 December 2002 at 5:53 PM
Uhh no i dont think your crazy as he slowly inches his way twords the door. Accually i do have a bit of experience with both digital and slr cameras. I love them both but in photography each one has its uses and limmits. The down side of a digital ( ok not the real expensive ones ) is your NOT going to get a quick shot off 70% of the time . Shooting kids is a good example . its hard enough with a regular camera . If your not in good light digitals most often have to think of God knows what and some times it must be the meaning of life . By the time its done the subect is long gone or all you have is a blurry foot or elbow. If your looking to take instant shots in mediocher lighting good luck. The upside is if your subject doesnt move you can do it all day long in what ever kind of light. For me the best part of a digital is the cost . I have a CD Mavica and it cost me pennies per shot . I have progress allot faster in my skills with a digital and saved $1,000s of dollars in developing cost that i can now pay to willing models who happen to like to pose in there opps never mind dont want to get Donald all wound up again. The point is digitals are great but it depends upon what your subjects are.