I understand what you are saying drsiemens. But I feel that if it were to become anonymous... some people would start giving out bad ratings (1-2) to people who they don't agree with on a forum or whatever. The fact that the rating is Identified sorta puts a damper on someone giving out "hateful" ratings. I Agree that alot of images are totally over rated...but one of the problems is that you shouldn't feel affraid to post your 5 rating even if the image is at 10 or high 9.x. I myself probably give out more high ratings than I should...but I usually look up that persons "portfolio" of images...and judge from there. I might give out a high rating to a "average" image if that person is new to poser or if its more of less there first try. Maybe I am wrong in doing so...but I rather pat someone on the back and encourage them...then give a low rating...cause quite frankly...some people take it harder than others. So my basic opinion is that I rather have everything Identified...the rating and the comments.

Its the Standard P4 Fem. I don't know if posette or eve is one of the names of the standard poser figure. I've always used the P4 fem character. The Texture map is 4000x4000 pixels...so its possible to zoom in even closer and have even more details. I wanted to have a texture where close-ups look ok.

well at the moment the texture is 2750x2750pixels...but the the problem is that the texture stretches to mouch around the arms legs etc... would oainter 3D help?

Hi VIDandCGI, I just sent you 12-13 Screenshots from the DVD. Hope it helps out a bit.

Appipulai! :) I was going to do the same project to once...but it got a little side tracked...ohh well. I have the movie on dvd and I hapen to have a dvd-rom. I could send you any number of screenshots if you think it might help you. Let me know if you want any. Solo22 solo22@citenet.net

I posted the large version in the gallery. But I is probably to blured...I will try to tone it down sometime tonight. you can go see the larger version at: http://www.renderosity.com/viewed.ez?galleryid=19092

The hair is real hair filtered over in post. about at 50%

• The girl and fish where done in poser<---(anyone notice the little fishies? hehehe) - Imported into Bryce4 to create a whole scene. And then Rendered - Post work done in Photoshop. Where i've added the details for the body/face/hair. Its kinda the same process as I did for the water drops in my "Sophia's Pool" image, wich I have a small tutorial on my http://poser22.tripod.com site. So bottom line is the image is completly rendered in Poser4/Bryce4...it just got touched up in photoshop so it would look more realistic. but you can still see a few poser/bryce flaws throughout the body...ohh well...close enough :)

now you've got me mixed up reddog :) hehe was that a response for moltingangel? I hope so...cause if it was for me...you lost me :) :) hehe

The images were different at the time I posted this message...But I since Changed the one on the gallery to be the one with the ripples...so yes...you are right...now they are exactly the same.

Thanks for the input... I've took away a bit of the glare on the navel ring and the eyebrow ring. Thanks for the tip Davo. ...And I've fixed a lot of other little gliches in the image. The New is in the gallery at: http://www.renderosity.com/viewed.ez?galleryid=9745 Hope it lives up to the great quality images that appears in this Forum/gallery. Solo22

Ok cool thanks

What Version of netscape do you have Foxhollow? I know you need the plug in for it to work on netscape... with Explorer...it will tell you you need to download something...but if you click "ok" it takes a second or 2...and you are on your way :)

Very Very Cool, I like it.

Ikyoto...what is the "one of those names" you are using?