Ignoring the fact that I did not use back face culling on the above wing image they both look the same dont you think! You had better think long and hard! If the answer is YES - dont you think that you should think twice about crying wolf when you are one yourself? If I were you I would sneek of quietly befor the BIG wolf who created these comes up and bites your ass! If the answer is NO - then I guess lots of people have the same creative processes because these are most definatly not your wings!

Virus - Is this your wing?

Red hair = Nothing It is not an indication of nationality just some genetic code As we all know allot of trouble was caused due to the fact of people stating that blue eyes and blonde hair = Arian I am of canadian Irish decent and have dark hair, does that make me a Pict? if so, shall I go off and tattoo my arse blue like any good Pict!

.---Heh... I can do that right now, for free >:) ---This ltest announcement is kind of a dower.. every "feature" they mentioned is already available in D|S..

That is as may be---
BUT

does DS have dynamic cloth-----NO
does DS have dynamic hair------NO
does DS use a FREE renderer---YES

This post was discussing the figures NOT what DS has take it somewhere else!!!

Right now back to the topic title---the FIGURES in P6 are rather intriguing can't wait for more images. A good looking male is what poser needs, a real man with a real belly and looks not a muscle bound nancy boy!!!

Attached Link: http://www.getjolly.com/modules.php?op=modload&name=phpbb2&file=viewtopic.php&t=54

Dag

Attached Link: http://www.abc.net.au/science/news/stories/s1236864.htm

Byrdie - Re: Lucas The author of dinotopia James Gurney, prior to the release of the series Dinotopia posted an accusation sighting that grorge lucas was a thief to the front page of Dinotopia.com - The origonal statement has been changed to a more toned down version probably for legal reasons - http://www.dinotopia.com/statement.html At the time Gurney was rightly cheezed off as his new show was set to come out and as the images were so similar he was afraid that he would be accused of copying Lucas!!- Gurney seems to have come around to the idea of being coppied now though! Check out the imagery for yourself there are several scenes - heres a cashed link if you are interested - http://www.google.ie/search?q=cache:5WriGbBbHQQJ:www.echostation.com/interview/gurney.htm+lucas+gurney&hl=en

Yansen - a very honest to the point post you just made, I don't know why we bother - deaf ears and all. Admittedly copyright infringement happens everywhere, on high street fashion and websites selling poser products...............that however does not mean that it is right! Inspiration may be gained from all around but there is a certain time that it goes beyond the point. Within the law there has been many an individual who has been sued over look and feel of an item never mind a blatant copy (not that I am talking of any particular item) the lack of talent in imitating another's work does not allow for the intent. Imitating work for resale is wrong, though imitating for self improvement has some merit.

cute - yes I rather thought so! I have a rather good understanding of the law. I do however get rather shocked by the amount of times people have to be forwarded to more formal copyright threads to explain. And even more shocked by the poeple who get wrangled in copyright disputes even with a fulltime copyright department. Even still interpretation by different parties always remains open, sometimes bazar. I suppose you can bring a horse to water but you can't make it drink. It seems that legal literature is a bit of a tough bedtime read for most! speaking of which......................................

"The creator and the owners of the product are already acting to address the matter" what you mean Square-Enix???? 8-P

This item should be removed from sale! If there is any copyright issue on any item the brokering company/creator has a duty to fully investigate such charges and remove the said item from sale until it has been given the full clear. There is a duty to the consumer! Without going into the nitty-gritty, within international digital copyright there is a clause about look and feel of said item. I think that no more can be said on this item as it is as plain as the nose on your face which side of the law this falls on. There is satire and then there is outright theft. I am shocked that it still remains available for sale to the general public thus involving them in any copyright issue.

are these images rendered in poser, if so which version I realy wish merchants would say

not confrontational at all on my behalf just matter of fact, i suppose it all depends on the tone of voice you read post in. for example i could read into your post that i got your back up. no offence ment. people can get a little touchy when it comes to copyright issues as you can understand. in relation to paypal donations contact them, im sure harald will point you in the right direction! enough said enjoy dragon*con might see you there!

yeh nice site, but thats because its os commerce. just a heads up! you might like to read the oscommerce copyright information before continuing though. it clearly states that the site has to be changed significantly (not just adding your logo and products) before you can remove the copyright information. people have put alot of hard work into oscommerce and deserve credit/recognition. As you know Just coz it FREE/GPL, copyright still exists...you wouldn't like someone doing it to you - right!

fair enough! ;)