He is using Geo Graft for that. I myself hate this.

This is what you are going to have to do, for the Genesis 3 and Genesis 8. I use the Genesis 8 .dsf file here as an example.

Navigate to:

[your runtime]/data/Sixus1/GalacticTyrant_G8/GalacticTyrantGloves

The file that you want to edit is Gloves_25290.dsf (make a copy of it, in case you make an editing mistake)

Run a text editor, I use Notepad++, and load the file. Then search for the following section and delete it and save the file.

            "graft" : {
                "vertex_count" : 16384,
                "poly_count" : 16196,
                "vertex_pairs" : {
                    "count" : 0,
                    "values" : [ ]
                },
                "hidden_polys" : {
                    "count" : 3632,
                    "values" : [ 9766, ... 15505 ]
                }
            },

You can then hide and unhide as you normally do, obviously.

Thank you.

She's looking great!

erogenesis posted at 8:07PM Fri, 20 November 2015 - #4239824

FYI, started on mesh #5, and will be the last mesh.

Good luck! I hope that Poser 11 cooperates with you this time.

Well, I fired-off another email and got an answer and an apology for not getting back to me. There definitely is a problem with the affiliate system that needs to be fixed. Hopefully that will get fixed asap.

BWsupport posted at 12:29AM Wed, 09 September 2015 - #4227137

nDelphi posted at 1:37PM Tue, 08 September 2015 - #4227045

PandaB5 posted at 7:30AM Tue, 08 September 2015 - #4225508

I still can't see any data in the affiliate portal. I cannot click on the calendars and going to insight gives me a data of 1969 which I'm unable to change.
I want to know urgently if I need to take down my Renderosity ads on my websites until this is fixed or whether you're still tracking that and it is just the interface that is broken.

Is anyone going to address this issue? The affiliate system is clearly broken. I have sent emails but really no one that matters has gotten back to me. I don't even see an affiliate cookie being added to my browser and the stats are a joke. I can't even see passed Aug 15, 2015.

@nDelphi I have logged in as you and everthing seems to work fine. Could you post a screen shot along with your browser and version.

It doesn't matter what browser I use. The stats issue remains. I can't see stats past Aug 15, 2015. Also, how do I know how much money I have made? How many signups? The stats page are not an improvement, it is a joke. You guys seriously need to change that.

Is the affiliate cookie saved as a different name? If so, which is it? So I can check on my end.

These questions should be easy to answer.

PandaB5 posted at 7:30AM Tue, 08 September 2015 - #4225508

I still can't see any data in the affiliate portal. I cannot click on the calendars and going to insight gives me a data of 1969 which I'm unable to change.
I want to know urgently if I need to take down my Renderosity ads on my websites until this is fixed or whether you're still tracking that and it is just the interface that is broken.

Is anyone going to address this issue? The affiliate system is clearly broken. I have sent emails but really no one that matters has gotten back to me. I don't even see an affiliate cookie being added to my browser and the stats are a joke. I can't even see passed Aug 15, 2015.

Awesome stuff, man!

Regarding DS compatibility, I would love nothing more since a lot of my friends are DS users, but Poison (from 'Otica) doesn't seem confident about getting it to work in DS. ... or ask Zev or Poison to sort that bit out...

Hmmm... I hope you sort that out. Like I said, I use DAZ Studio a lot. I understand that your figure was designed for a specific use, but still, if you can do it, I think a company with much larger budgets and an army of 3D experts behind them can also do it.

Lol I don't see why there has to be fighting. PE is probably going to be available for Daz as well you know:) It's not a Poser exclusive figure as far as I know. Lalli was available for both. So let's leave the app wars out of this. Pretty sure both sides will be able to enjoy the figure:)

Exactly. I am actually chuckling now. Anyway, you better than most know exactly why I had to make the comparison. Whithout PAs like you, which are less than a handful of you, the Genesis line of figures, which let me reiterate, I like, wouldn't look as good.

I will stress that people should not compare this to DAZ's Genesis figures, or any other figures for that matter. Project E is a figure that has been designed to work for my comics, and is tailored for supporting an artist that knows the deal when it comes to complex CG figures.

Sorry, I can't help myself. I just loaded up Genesis 3 Female and posed her as you have your figure in the third render you provided and I don't see a superior Genesis 3 Female figure. Your figure is showing the elbow bone (the Ulna?) for Christ's sake! And the bend is 100% natural.

 and learn your grammar shit for brains

This is the kind of post that should get a forum user banned for life. There is no excuse for this.

There are plenty of photoreal Poser and DAZ Studio renders around. I am talking about real photoreal, not the many Reality/LuxRender renders you see around with melted butter looking hair and skin so glossy that it looks like PVC plastic.

I wasn't talking about Poser/DAZ Studio "photoreal" (with quotes), I was talking about GCSociety (without quotes) photoreal.

If this is the best DAZ/Poser photoreal image you've seen you should browse around more. That's all I meant. Are you telling us you haven't even seen MEC4D's latest iRay renders. Her Maya iRay 2015 test render alone is a great photoreal piece, so is her Luis iRay 2015. In the end it depends on the skill of the artist.

Not mine, mind you, I am just reposting.

It is the most realistic render of a digital human I ever saw outside of the professional arena.

A good example of how groundbreaking is the Studio 4.8 Genesis 3 combo.

There are plenty of photoreal Poser and DAZ Studio renders around. I am talking about real photoreal, not the many Reality/LuxRender renders you see around with melted butter looking hair and skin so glossy that it looks like PVC plastic. I myself have a full length photoreal nude render that I did that is among the most realistic ones I ever did. I called it Hanging Fruits Portrait. The model is not looking directly at the camera, something I was criticized for. Apparently you can't be your own creative muse, you have to do portraits based on someone else's muse.

http://www.beammeup.net/nudes/2012/01/25/hanging-fruits-portrait/

I hghly doubt as I have said before that these decisions are based on emotions, and by market pressure I meant their customers. If enough of them scream loud enough SM might add support. It just makes so much business sense.

Until only recently has SM released a survey for their customers, however it was released a link in the forums, ... So if you don't get a true cross section of your customers, you're not really going to know what features you should be targeting.

Well, I can see how that can be a problem if you truly want to know what the professional user wants as well. Those who don't spend their time on the forums defending their maniacal love for their favorite tools.