As I was thinking about shooting a so lovely pet..I wondered what you said Pascale..exactly, when asking for shooting ???? :D

I like the first one with the softness! This a a very good shooting idea ;-)

Message edited on: 05/16/2005 00:18

Lol :D I Don't know how to say that in english... On dirait qu'Elle Boude.... A wonderfull shot for the family album :-)

WoW! Stunning.. it has a great impact! Excellent shot and postwork!

lol..chui mdr en lisant tes commentaires sur la p'tite be :D Never seen that dogs before...On the second shot he seems to tell you ''no I won't give you the paw'' he might have read in your mind.....

Great thank's Dough...I was expecting this! I am missing too much of really fantastic shots!

Really great shots! I love the action in the first one and as Joe...the guy pulling down the moon ;-)

I do agree with the girls ;-) But it is really a question of taste !

Merci Pascale! Lol moi aussi j'ai impressionnla petite touche franise de Dough..c'est mignon ;-)

Bravo tu as finalement rssi loader tes photos ;-) Excellente entr! J'aimes bien les dormations dans chaque carreau aussi ;-)

Thank's for the virtual tour! A really nice set of shots...I really like the first and last one wich is kind of ''zen''!

Hi everybody! I'vbe been curious about what has been mentionned in this topic as i often need to enlarge my picture, I use Shortcut photozoom, wich as you know, add pixels with an advance arithmetic feature. The result is pretty uch good, but, for sure there is noise added, wich desperate me. So yesterday night, I did this experiment as explained here..and my question is I am stupid or am I having an illusion but I found an interesting thing, that seems to me too simple to be true... I took a 72 dpi 300X400 image on the web with achitecturals details...I open it in psp, duplicate it into a vector layer, than rezize the image to 8X10 inches to 300 dpi...Create a new selection and copy it as a new normal rast...I than I save this as a tiff image...I opened it...and is it a miracle or what..the new bitmap image is having really 8X10,between 3000 and 4000 pixels and 300 dpi..from 100 ko I had 40 megs..the image was very crisp and clear..no noise...I check with few editors and averything was the same... Does it means that I really would have the same quanlity i saw on the screen than to print? How could be explained all this trouble to add pixels if converting into vector and back to bitmap is so easy to enlarge..Do i misse something? Thank's a lot for your comments!

Tu t'en sort Rodomolo? Tu as bien compris le principe..selon le the choisis...loader l'image et loader le thumbnail ici dans un nouveau topic que tu cren mentionnant ''monthly challenge entry'' Allez tu y arriveras..moi non plus je comprenais pas au dut..lol

Message edited on: 05/10/2005 00:22

I regularlyly use that type of settings for macro flowers and it works fine with the zomm and make it possible to benefit from the ambiant light without using a ring flask ;-) Your shots are really good!

This is a baeautifull shot to keep in family's memories!