Yes it seems to have gone now. I'm amazed. Renderosity will become famous as the art site that censored Leonardo da Vinci .

sorry I just read your reasons above Stacey. So in the interests of "uniformity" you are saying that there is no diference between an artwork and an advertisement for some merchandise. Surely outsiders will not have access to all work here bcause there would be no point in having membership.

"We have already told you that a thumbnail is supposed to be an accurate representation of the image you've posted"
If the image is a nude how is it possible to have an accurate representation of the image if nudity in the thumbnail is not allowed, If there is no nudity in the thumbnail then it is not an accurate representation.of the main image.

"We aren't going to allow suggestive or "censored" words,
blots or blurs." 
OK I understand that bit. 
"The thumbnail should be an accurate representation of the image
you've posted."
OK I, also, understand that bit.
So you are not allowed to use the content of the picture if it is a nude figure. Because a true thunbnail should be simply a small version of the main picture. But that isn't allowed. OK And I'm not allowed to do a thumbnail that has any blots, blurs, smudges or any other form of action painting oh and no words that may be considered suggestive or rude or naughty OK. 
Thank god I don't do nude photography.

"An announcement made by a moderator in a public forum does not imply an invitation to debate" That is true , however, why is the posibility of debate enabled if the invitation to debate is not desired?

I don't think I will ever understand. :)
By the way US law on "exposure". It is gender specific. It only refers to men. Women cannot expose themselves. So under US law a women who runs down the street topless doesn't actually exist. Though I'm sure she wouldn't get very far.

yes we have, I suspect, questions or comments to make in this thread regarding this topic and I'm sure we are free and welcome to make them just as I and you have but the decision has been made so why bother to pretend that you are listening to our comments. Why not just announce it as a news item. It's unreal democracy. It's only pixel deep.

I just noticed something, I guess I can be a little slow, 
"We will not be going backward with this new policy as there are too many images in the gallery to be able to get this accomplished but going forward we will be enforcing this new policy"
So there will exist a dual system. Some nude Thumbnails will exist for some images but this will not be allowed for other similar images.
OK
Love the Dichotomy. Now this is real art.

What is the point of this thread? What is the point of the same topic on the front page. The rulers have made their decision on how this is going to work, so just do it, why try to pretend there is some posibility of democracy, Sorry if that sounds cynical but I think maybe it might be :)

Wish I could work out how to add smilies.

It's an amazing experience. It's like Krishna with MDMA.

The texture on the dress is good. I think when it comes to models I still prefer the Gods Adam 1 and Eve 1. Al of these V's look like plastic dolls. Quite expensive plastic dolls :)

that's true best leave it really :)

Attached Link: http://www.luxology.com/whatismodo/

I know someone with a dog called Patch. Found him and his 8 siblings on the Fojal river.