Now all together....

On the good ship lollypop......
mmm that's probably against the TOS too. ;0)

Can anyone tell me why I continue to smell carbolic soap when I log on here?

Message edited on: 03/12/2005 18:38

"Uh.... how do the farmers wives feel about that?" Aaarg, they gots da eyeesh on da bulls, ish da farmers dash worried... slump.

slurp! ::Hic:: CRASH -Ish dat the gound..?- Ooooh my head don't freeel so goood. Wash in d' bockle? NO! no popcorn, no....slump Slithering sounds STORM being dragged of to his bed by 4 willing slaves, all based on the Laura mesh. "Dtangs to all da morpers....ish a hard life! G 'night

Hey Byrdie, ..I need... er, can I have just one lille one of ur 99 bockles o beeeer onnda wall.....pleeeeaase?

Well there is a big difference between marketing and the finished render. Bottom line, every render is judged on what it looks like. Turn Vicky into a 14-year-old child and put her in a sexual situation and you are going to be turfed off this site and most others. So it does not matter a damm what people produce and make, it is how you use that product. That is where the responsibility lies. Misuse or abuse of a product to produce Child Porn is the responsibility of the artist. You can use the standard V3 Morphs to produce a waif-like kid and and then use scaling to turn that mesh into a 12-year-old look-alike. Should DAZ withdraw V3 as a consequence?

" see David Amos' view. With these morphs, Laura could be just a short adult, but she could also turn into an oversexualized child. Personally, I thought on her release that this figure could cause a lot of controversy." You mean this one? I thought that had been answered

Hah! A row! ;0)

Ad Hoc committes already exist that keep watchdog on Rendo interpretions, but they are generally classed by the PTB as troublemakers, old guard (Jack and Ed supporters), Poser Forum ride-into-town Terrorists (big list there), mavericks, and general lunatics (I can think of at least one there).
The real question is in which category we put ourselves? ;0)

"Those who make the rules (change, abuse, use,), ahem, interpret the rules"

"I think I'm going to see if my Mil horse can get it on with the mil cat."

Rnderotica has had some interesting discussions on that whole topic with reference to bestiality depictions.

I am curious as to what the TOS here states as regards Beast on Beast sexual/reproduction images.

I have a friend who is a vet, and we have discussed the possible use of Poser to create a visual reference manual for farmers in Ireland that are going back to Bull on Cow fertilisation.
Just in case anyone thinks I am Joking, I am not.
AI or Artificial Insemination has been used for years in Ireland, however, farmers are now going back to the "natural methods" after many years, thus the interest in a visual manual.

Anyone got thoughts on the issue?

There is probably a whole market out there for pet breeding manuals, not to mention Zoos and rare species. From Goldfish to Hippos.

Message edited on: 03/11/2005 19:12

Thanks. Wish you said that 90 posts back! ;0)

" I don't want my characters to have HUGE boobs...IMHO it's not natural."
Tell that to the girl In the grade above me in Highschool whose boobs were larger than that. :p"

And I bet for a couple of years the boys fell over themselves trying to date her. But, then it all went away in her early twenties.
Lots of girls opt for breast reduction surgery at that point. I can't blame them. An asset becomes a impediment. nature can be very cruel to some. Now we are back to discusiing ideal breast sizes. How did that happen?

Message edited on: 03/11/2005 18:12

I am suppin' "Stella Artois" at the moment, a nice Belgian contribution to civilisation. What's your poison?

"FWIW...it seems to me that David is referring to something that most of us don't know about. Apparently, products similar to Wyrm's were banned from Rosity due to the new TOS (or new enforcement of the TOS?). He's not upset about boobs on Laura, he's upset about the uneven enforcement of the TOS."

Well in that case he should have directed his attack against Rendo and its' policies instead of trying to attack the morality or acceptability of wyrmmaster's product. If it is not the product, but double standards, that offend, why not simply say so?
I am all for the EXPOSURE of double standards here, and I don't need wyrmmaster's magnets to do that! :0)

Message edited on: 03/11/2005 17:48

"Some people think that if something is made legal, that it is also made moral. Hitler made genocide legal and the Germans didn't complain." So now turning a bunch of polygons into and ADULT and LEGAL mesh equates to genocide? Mein Gott! where were you when DAZ produced a NUDE Laura in the first place? Besides I think you need to look at history a little bit more closely before making sweeping statements like that, lots of Germans complained, they also ended up in the concentration camps. I know, relations and friends of my family were among them! I am half German and Half Irish.