I don't consider those problems, it's how the artist chooses to use her is where the problem lies.  
If you take the effort you can make Aiko look really, real, right now I'm a fan of thorneworks and if you look in my gallery you'll see, she has a "anime feel" about her vice real using the stated above morphs. 

whoa! and Bravo!  You know I never thought of it that way, I don't consider what I do true anime but more of an american anime (which is developing it's own unique flavor) but still the same anime mind set rules apply.

Body type and size is how I determine the age and it does fit in the anime mind set rules you've talked about...hopefully that doesn't make me an artist. (Artist don't support the troops...LOL)

There is nothing wrong with C+, it's my opnion, a B is above average and A is Superior, if I were to grade it on this thread I'd give it a D-, because you're trying but I see nothing but everyone spining their wheels....but I know the pains and how hard it is to be subjective...so C plus is what I think at this point in time.  A lot better that what I thought a few months back let me tell you.  And just for asking the question....you don't support the troops! Shame on you!

LOL...the support the troops is just my funny phrase of the week, if you don't know where it comes from you won't understand but trust me it makes me chuckle, Democrats wouldn't get it because they don't support the troops.

Billy if you took my whole "you're not american if you're not finger pointing" seriously, it was an over exaggerated point...in fact I said it was.  I think you think that because you don't support the troops!  That's messed up, that's really messed up.    Ok you can chuckle now.

Stacey, I know that a lot of the time people give their story and not the whole story and there are times I doubt the validity of people I truly do trust when things seem to be so one sided, especially when it's just seems hateful.  So some of the stories I see on other sites I raise an eyebrow and really wonder what is the true story and not HIS story.  

Since I work with one of the banned and at one time with Aikofan (well the husband half) and know the guy, I can make a pretty fair assesment of the validity of his points but as do all people we joke and when I say something like "banned for making pictures of naked kids"  it strikes a nerve in him.  When he was first given the boot, I look back and watch him type furiously on his computer or he had me proof read his replies to Karen to ensure that he wasn't being to harsh with his words.  

Of course there have been replies made without me proof reading and I never saw the first render of his that was taken down but that's the one he admits that it was wrong, not his intent, but a naked child is a naked child no matter what the context.

He's done with the issue but I can see what his point was.  My stance is, it's your site and you all are free to ban whomever you wish.  Would I like to see BLANK come back and BLANK, and let's not forget BLANK AND BLANK too, but rules are rules, two tears in a bucket.

You guys are doing a C + job policing and punishing TOS violaters (you miss a few...hey your human so I can't give you an A  and sometimes I think you're a little more harsh on others so can't give you a B) but hey C+ is good, it's average.

Oh yeah, I don't think you support the troops either Stacy and that's so very, very messed up! LOL

Just to play devil's advocate on the part of the "finger pointers", we live in a society of finger pointers and that's a good thing let me cite examples:

The American colonist were upset because of unfair taxes and said "Hey if those guys in England don't have to go through this stuff, why do we?"

Woman said if men can vote why can't we

Blacks said how come it's wrong for me to use this door when all the whites can?

I guess that makes them all 6 year olds.  The cases cited a little extreme in comparison to the subject at hand...yes but it does illustrate my point.

Primals warning was taken off his record only because it was aired here...but those in the past that feel they have been wronged may have tried to state their problems in private but since it wasn't aired out...they're gone...at another site I've seen renders of a few people who were banned here and when I posted that they should email the mods, I recieved more than a few saying they had (and not in the nicest ways I might add).  I don't know them personally but one I do, I've seen what caused all his 1st, 2nd, 3rd nd 4th time, the first one was very much in violation of the TOS, and he admits it was his mistake (a woman being cloned in a tank...but not at the age of maturity yet), the second time he agreed what it the mods thought it looked like, I think it was a stretch...the last two...heck no.
You probably already got an email from him so I won't beat that horse, but 6 years?  Thank God for em!

I like the "intent" thing discussed.  Yes, some may be iffy and in those cases...yeah take the offending pic off...but to ban?  Only the blatent offenders should be punished.  Most of the time you can see the intent, but I thinks (yes I put an "s" on think) that no one really looks at renders with the Girl and Aiko for "intent" if it's not posted in the fairy gallery. 

No offense to the fairy gallery folks...I love what they do with aiko and fairy gallery means hmmm let me guess fairies, now a naked pic of Aiko in Poser and People or realism that looks underage...well hmmm let me think on this one.  

Anime and Manga....hmmm.  I don't know.  I'm very glad the mods are here because some things really shouldn't be allowed but I know of three artist here who are here and the "intent" was definately "just posting" with the Girl and Aiko but in the end...

I hate reading this topic because I think it's silly (not the subject at hand) because in the end it's a discussion that leads to nothing...nothing is gonna change, but still I read and still I type.

Everyone having a very funky day!  :)

Thank you!  It's really appreciated!

everybody put down their revolvers....or in Ironbears case bow (no disrespect I love animotions) anywho if you want to change your name, 10 bucks if you don't want to pay then don't change it.  I liked Martian Manhunter I was hoping for a change to J'onn Jonz (spelled it wrong but the comic guys no what I mean) but everyone seems to be getting charged up over nothing.  Silly.

Trekkie girl's name made sense to me, now I know her from other places and didn't think she was here...now I know for sure.  Other's hey whatever floats your boats.

Should mods and admins get perks...well hell yeah, if you worked in JC Penny you'd get a store discount or somthing wouldn't you.  

The only perk I get from my job is...is...uh...um....well the sense of pride of serving my country and an occasional free beer when I appear somewhere in uniform, it's a perk...right...damn now I'm depressed, gotta make some piggies!

I think this makes sense!

I'm having fun, i was purposely trying to get Aikofan riled because i know how they are (it's two people for those of you who don't know).  But  I pissed them both off way beyond a joke.  

Now to speak seriosly on some of the commenters
"Fairies are expected to look young"....well so's anime.
Recent post...very recent but I don't fingerpoint.  And in Aikofan's defense the artist she pointed out hadn't posted in a very long time which is why she used that as an example and not  the other billion links i sent her.  It was all in good fun but the comments here really pissed her off (some of mine too..well maybe lot's of mine) so for that I apologize.  

Common sense in an uncommon trait and the topic is near and dear to my heart  but to end my bit in this, my official statement;

I think Renderosities bans are well intentioned but not even across the board.  I further think that a great deal of people were booted with little provacation, despite how many warnings because since they for the most part seem biased.  I think the Renderosity admins should clearly define what the Girl and Aiko are and keep those rules consistant across the board.  Permanent banning should be done when it made clear that an artist in intentionally trying to post an underage charecter and it is done in an offensive way (fairy posting would be safe since it's in that realm of un intentional and a lot of aniime as well not that the renders wouldn't be removed but banning...too far for any amount of time).  Having said this, I will comply with Rendo's TOS , if a render of mine is taken down, yes I will say that's stupid but....I will not try to atttempt to put the same thing up again (that would be intentional).  

That's my piece no go back to kitty talk, and I'l go back to perverted pigs!

Well, I think we should all gather up at the local church and burn every thing Aiko!  

I was just wandering through the galleries and thought to myself "ooh they let that go by and that, and that".   There is so much here that looks like the underage Aiko nudes and I'm inclined to think, that either the mods are sleeping or we are starting to look at nude Aiko in a different light.

I'm not sure, someone clear this up for me, because I'm just going "wow, that's risque" but the images still remain...answers please.

If it's the case of mods sleeping well that happens....no one's perfect.

If it's the latter, perhaps some message where we can all know.

Now just to ask, what of those members who pay for the gallery plus option, they pay to post images, now if the image violates the TOS, yes it should be taken down, but what if an image doesn't and a member who paid to have it posted is banned and the whole gallery is taken down.  Does that  constitute a breach of contract.?  A service has been exchanged, a fee has been collected. 

Honest question, I really came here hoping the thread was finished....apparently not, got to reading and that q popped in my noggin.

I'm bowing out of this too, no real reason to continue this.

Many other sites will pull images and not ban a member for any amount of time.  What is defined as Multiple it seems 4 over a three year period....

Well, my two cents, removing an image that may violate the TOS...I support that.  Removing an Artist from the site who didn't purposely violate the TOS (you can tell when someone does it purposely) that's stupid.  Especially one who is paying to post 3 images a day...well do you think that person is really trying to violate the precious TOS.  Now if you told someone hey, we pulled your pic because...and they're reply was "well funk that, I'm gonna post what i want, and then they do the same the next day, the day after...well yeah, boot 'em. 

Anywho, the site isn't going to change it's policy and if it does I think those who were banned would probably stil be banned. 

Unfortunately, no there was no sarcasm.  I had a thread removed for doing such a while back, here's the quote  "Hi there,

I have removed your thread asking about banned members from the Poser forum. We cannot discuss details of current or past members with anyone else."

maybe you can say their names ....but I'm alll about caution.