The shader is for the render engine 3Delight and as such for the alpha of Daz Studio, the implication here is that you can take figures from Poser, into Daz Studio and toon shade them. I agree with Dialyn, it's misleading to post it here as currently only owners of 3delight or Platinum Club members (Daz Studio - pre-release alpha) can benefit from this and it has nothing to do with Poser except in related figure use.

***Good displacements don't depend on the mesh density *** I didn't say it did, I said that "even with" dense mesh Studio couldn't do it. That means, simple mesh or dense mesh Studio cannot reproduce the displacement that was achieved with Poser 5 in Bip's link and Cinema when I tried it.

when he worked on the FireFly render for Poser 5. Definitely a plus when it comes to efficient modeling and materials But can Poser 5 produce results like those posted by Stewer in #7 I've not seen anything even remotely like it done so far. Would be interesting to know.

Can you set displacement to more than 100%? Sorry, Baz, took a while to get the answer. Yes you can set displacement higher in Studio. It will climb to 200% I don't know what fine tuning or adjustments Daz will make to that

wouldn't necessarily be advertised on the forums as a target for flamers. Ahh that's fair enough then. Logically they wouldn't need to be identified on the forum at all. The alert could be added to the existing tools for posting to threads, clicking that would generate a link for the thread and mailbomb the mods/admin that someone had a concern about that thread. No notification would need to be left on the forum at all if the software can generate the link code. Shouldn't be too difficult to add in my opinion, but what do I know about programming? :)

Are you sure you aren't confusing Iraq with Farenheit 451? Far as I know there isn't a suggestion box on every street corner at all. Who needs them when mass murder is far more adequate. As for the suggestion made by Dialyn here, I think it's a good idea. I'm sure there are lots of people who would be more than happy to click a box for every single little TOS violation they imagine happens. Heck the mods might even get some real alerts and warez threads won't stay open for hours while the children play in them. Sorry, Dialyn, not trying to be sarcastic it's not a bad idea, the shout box at 3-DArena works just fine although I don't think the anonymous idea is good. There's nothing wrong with being identified as a squealer and mods/admin are better off knowing who posted for their own records. Besides, people might think before abusing the system if they know they'll be identified when posting an alert.

Jade. I know "why" it's done like that, jeez I've been here long enough to figure that out, thanks. What I don't get is the complaint about the comment on the product. There's nothing wrong there, the customer didn't like the extra steps but gave the product a fair compliment and a four star rating.. yet it's not "logical". Please.

but liking to work to use them. Should read "but NOT liking to work to use them." Oh for an EDIT option

But the user isn't saying that there's a problem with your textures. He compliments them. He's saying they're very good but he doesn't like to use UVMapper. As your textures are UVS encoded you must use UVMapper to make them work, the buyer didn't like having to do that. It's perfectly logical. I know a lot of people who don't like using UVMapper for anything, they don't understand it. A lot of new Poser users might not know what a UVS is and might think they get a character as well as textures, from that comment they will know. So they will know they need UVMapper to work with your textures. Maybe you see something different but I see someone liking your textures but liking to work to use them. :)

***come back with the old option for look out this comments *** Oh, you mean the old option where the vendors are allowed to CHOOSE what goes in the review, so that they're only ever seen as "gawds" with "wow cool" comments? No thanks. I prefer honesty in marketplaces. What's the problem AndyGraph? I see a good comment from a customer who possibly did or did not purchase all your files stating that he didn't like having to use UVMapper? As all the products are the same requiring the same methods to make them work why is the comment out of place? I don't see anything bad there. What? You don't like less than glowing 5 star reports? Grow up, live with it, go make more things to sell. Sheesh. This sort of silly behaviour is precisely why the old method didn't work. There's no criticism on the post and several compliments. Yet you manage to try to draw a conclusion about someone you've never met? Fascinating. My vote is for the comments to stay Clint, they're not offensive, not misleading and show a good review if not "wow kewl, yer a god"

a Raking and Text Review Nice one. About time too. Assuming the merchant is cut out of the loop and that there is the chance for trolling to be removed. Just one thing Clint. Raking? That's a typo, right? Surely you're not encouraging customers to rake a product over the coals. :)

I don't know how difficult edit would be to add to this forum. It appears to me that it is already active for certain staff members so it's obviously built into the forum software. Renderosity is a flagship example for Bondware software which is sold to customers. If a customer wants edit (which many I should think do) it would seem a rather silly exclusion. Most likely it simply has been disabled for this site rather than excluded from the code.

how many post before searching for the answer in a previous thread While I do agree with much you say Barbarellany, I think that threads should stay intact, the option to EDIT a post would be more acceptable to most than the ability to delete a post. However, this one statement I've selected, have you tried searching for something in Poser forum? Or any forum? You get a mass of disorganised stuff back, much utterly irrelevant. The search functions on this website are possibly the worst I've ever encountered and it seems utterly incapable of handling even a simple boolean search. I have a feeling there's a good reason so many questions are asked over and over and over again, and it's not always because the poster is too lazy to look for the answer. :)