ok i can't explain well in english but i think u've understood.... may be not "someone" that put his art on the wall.. but a "member of the gallery" that have done a "harder than his own usual" piece of art but.. finally i don't want to rise more the discussion

"I'm sorry you feel so abused when 1 picture was pulled and 38 were kept" i think .. and this is only a thought that runs in my brain, that is not the picture itself.. reading the forums i've felt a certain malcontent growing.. started with the violence tag or increased with it... passing by annlee image and the site colors .. than gilo.. maybe others i can't be on line all teh time and i'm new here.. but .. i can feel a growing state of suffocation and limitation... "Would you go to the MOMA or the Louvre and tell the curators that they have to put your work up on their walls?" but can u go in a museum and say - this picture is disturbing me please cover it or remove it - ??? at least.. maybe.. i have a different concept of art than other people here :) just a thought not an attack :)

"a woman lying on the couch caressing her breast and playing with her nipple with a very ... suggestive ... look" mmm i've only seen a woman with a hand posed on her breast... maybe the difference between a pornographic image and a simple nude image is in the mind of the observer.... i think i am a bit deranged or perverse but in my mind i haven't seen any caressing or playing in the gilos still!

gilo i totally agree with you

i think my next 3 artworks cannot be uploaded here at rendo couse of censorship problems... i'm feeling a bit suffocated :(

well for few members many of us have the fabulous violence red write under theyr thumbs... i think that in a normal society the right think is to let all (ALL) the community to vote... but this is an art site so... there will be no action of censorship but great discussion an morality or something like that... so i'm confused... i'm wondering to delete my gallery and my account for more open minded and free galleries...but i will see how this story goes... may be i'm wrong

i think the final wladamire question is: why violence have a different treatment?? it's ok to prevent people to watch what they don't want but why the violence flag cant be setted up as the nudity flag?? so if someone don't want to see violence he/she just have to check the button on his profile... this will keep the galleries free for that people and free from the red advertisement...equal treatment... you know a violence label under the thumbnail can be... discriminant.. (no polemic i'm just tryin to clear my point of view :))

mmm may be too late but: "Yes, Renderosity has my permission to use my artwork from my art gallery for promotional use only". i'm italian and i can't go to SigGraf ... i wish that a part of me (my art) can go :)

well the freedom to post a gorey image under evry category will be cool (couse sometimes the title and the category can be part of the whole concept of the image). i think that post an image under the horror category only couse it contains some gore is artistically limitative... if the price to pay is a button to chek.. well ok.. the only thing that put a shadow on this eventuality is that my believe (i hope not only mine) that art has no bundaries will decay...

well at the end there is a notice : the image is posted under the horror category so... i agree hat some images are not good for all the people but.. the only thing is: please don't start a witch hunt :). freedom is hard to obtain and very simple to loose...