Damn it! it kix ass, i don't know how u managed so well to get the light source. very good work !

I'm used to design flyers and i work in 600dpi (flyers are not A3). The most important for this kind of projetcs is 1/ CMJN 2/ a marging for the printer 3/ use a good color profile for u're monitor as to be able to control what will be printed in real time: the result is never what u see on u're screen! 4/ Be sure of the format (EPS, TIF, PSD etc...) needed I would advise u to work in 400dpi to be secure with the printer.

i think you may be misunderstanding something. a max file contains all the datas about light, key frames, anims etc... it's a whole scene in there! Whereas a 3ds file is just a model, a mesh, an object! u cannot convert your animation settings to an object: it's impossible to convert a max file to 3ds one.

Clowns make me cry, each time i see one, i have that feeling, he's a poor guy trying to have kids laughing as if he was so despered that it could be is only goal in life.... philosophy.... i hate philosophy.... interesting picture by the way. :)

stephbois, i had to use that kind of film because i was making a photographic presentation of paris and the goal was to get photos that look old but are not. I thought the grain would give a romantic aspect to the pictures and it did for most of them. The man jumping has been taken with the same film. And as i couldn't take the picture on any other angle, a front directed blur would not have been impressive enough as it would not have described the move of the roller skater (who is a friend of mine by the way).

hey well, thanks for saying it's good, i'm just a beginner at photography and by the way, english is not my mother language so it's gonna be difficult for me to talk about technics. I was expecting that kind of result, a very small depth of field (macro) that i got with my Minolta Reflex X700 (set to a programmed mode) + Tokina Skylight 50-250mm lens + B&W 400 Iso film... But i couldn't know the body of the guitar would be so soft compared to the mechanics. On the real picture, the difference of sharpness is definitly more choking than on the scanned one. Moreover, i'm not used to using this kind of film, i usually 'work' with 3200 Iso film so as to be able to shoot sport scenes with no blur. (see above)

Hey Don't know if it can help you guys to understand 'cause i didn't read all of the posts but the depth of field mostly depends on the size of aperture of the diaphragm. The less it's opened, the more the surrounding will be blured. I must admit i don't know anything to digital cameras. I own a Minolta X700 reflex camera with a 50-250 Tokina lens. I'm still french

The last is .... impressing.... i just love it, had never seen such a marvelous color picture of snow falling.

Hey, pretty interesting work, i like it but i would have loved it if you hadn't put so many transparent layers. The one with the girl, in the middle is just perfect, the others are, i believe, a little bit of too much. But but i must admit i would never have had the idea. PS scuse my english, i'm french

1152x854 on 17" liama 8617