Ha funny, I look at that and totally see Scarlett. Good thing we're not the colaborative team trying to create a texture set for either one of those two celebs!

I do see your point but I dunno, Acadia. This looks really a lot more like the texture set.

http://www.hissandpop.com/scarlett-johansson/scarlett-johansson-006.html

Pure speculation but I agree with the most of the others here. Adam, I'm sure if you PM him would confirm or deny for you.

1. Uma Thurman
2. Brooke Shields
3. Kiera Knightly
4. Beyonce Knowles (Render 4 on the product page really shows it)
5. Megan Fox
6. Scarlett Johansen
7. Rhianna (I think)
8. Cameron Diaz
9. Lucy Liu

Is there any news on the outfit? It is suddenly quite quiet on the thread everyone is busy testing I suppose. Maybe a beta teaser image or three? Even better would be the news that it was so brilliantly put together that it was released to the store and I somehow missed it!

Definitely very cool! Great work! I love the idea that it can be used for more than one character. I think it would make a great freebie, which in theory should drive people to buy things from you. Of course, those of us who already have already know how cool your stuff is. Great work!

Wow, you know I have not checked the galleries this much since well since I don't know when. Perhaps we could shelve this discussion and then bring it back out in about 2 months? That way I can read through 350+ posts checking galleries of people and finding some really amazing art.

Of course, we'd need to impose a limit on the number of opinions/arguments you could present and if you've presented something here, you wouldn't be allowed to play again as that would interfere with the finding of new galleries. And just for giggles you would be required to submit any argurment/opinion/drivel to a board to be approved for further debate. Board chosen at random preferable living active members but we must give all equally fair chances to be on this board, so we'll just use a phone book, location TBD. This would in turn cause a new debate to be born to debate the debate more galleries to look at then... its all the strategery I say.

Yes, I do realize that I am not really adding anything constructive to this discussion, but after 370 posts does it really matter? Several very valid points have been made on both sides, review the whole thread its kinda fun but remember to blink and take potty breaks - trust me on this, I've got quite a mess here and I can't close my eyes! I've cast my vote 7perW (1per would have been nice). Anyone offended by me or my comments should contact my mom its all her fault, oh and please ask her why she forgot my birthday this year.

In parting I'd just like to say 'if this limit discussion is because of bandwidth issues the-'

Cheers,
E

Hey thanks, tresamie & theringess. I'm using both suggestions but I'm also just poking around on my own! I really appreciate the help! Cheers, E

Ok, that's kinda what I thought was the approach to getting started. All right, I'll start playing and see what comes out. Thanks, firefly! E

as a general rule, the higher the f-stop #, the smaller the opening...so a higher number f16, 22 would be probably be closer to a small pupil f2, 3, 4: night Also though a higher f-stop gives you more depth of field in the picture all by itself. But I could ask over in the photography forum if that doesn't work/make sense/etc

Cool! Please let me know what you discover. I've got zero python skills and was just at a complete loss as to how to figure things out. Thanks!

Little Dragon, Thank you very much. That was my problem, I kept messing with the regular eyebrows which must have been throwing something into the mix. Thanks again! Cheers, Bucky