Wow, thank you so much, I am honored to be among all these fine artists. Congrats to everybody

No, I have not gotten any message. Please resend and thank you.

Thank you very much, have a nice christmas.

Quote - Most likely thing is that the normals (on the apparently missing parts) are the wrong way round.

Yes, I had the idea too, so I tried the invert normals function in Poser, but it did not solve the problem. I have also noticed, that you can see the missing parts when you rotate the model in Zbrush, as if the mesh itself is too thin.

Yes, I see now that the "base" model is bigger then the model inside zbrush. No I am  sure that I have not. I have also tried to just load and export the jacket, got the same problem. I would not care to redo the morph, but I can so far not fix the vertice problem. Will check out your link and hope that things will get better.

Welding has always caused problems in Zbrush, so I leave this option always unchecked.

So far the jacket is mapped and rigged, modelled for the standart M4 figure. Now I wanted to create a full body morph which I have done for other clothes millions of time.

My workflow is pretty simple: I load my morphed M4, conform the jacket, export both with the options "...body part names" and "existing groups in polygon groups" import in Zbrush with "triangles to quads" unchecked, create the morph in edit mode, export each group back to poser and load the targets there.

Thanks for the answer. I tried it both ways, grouped to the hand and in another try to the forearm with the same result. How can I check the joint inclusion zones? Sorry if that is a dump question, it's the first time I have created something with long sleeves and I have to learn a lot yet.

Definately a sign I should wear my glasses more often. The vendor has replied to me too by the way. I have not seen it before, so sorry for the trouble. Thank you for your support, customer is happy again :D

Okay, I will. And to you too.

Yes of course, the order ID is: 111904957. Thanks in advance.

carodan: I love traditional art as well, looking through the paintings of different centuries is a great source for inspiration. I could sit hours in front of a Carravaggio and lose myself in its masterpieces...
I never tried to recapture this though, I think it is worth a try.

PS. you have a stunning gallery, I compliment you for your very natural renders.

FightingWolf: My general style is more or less aiming for a "video game" look. I do not know how to describe this any better. The CG images of games like SoulCalibur and FinalFantasy have a great influence on what I am trying to do.

To me it is often the opposite, I always think, that something is "missing" in my pictures without knowing what it is.

Miss Nancy: this is helpful, thank you very much.

Paloth: I dont "cry" for attention, I am satisfied with the attention I have. My problem is not that I do not know how to achieve this or that, if that WAS the case, I would prefer to use google for a tut because I am a very shy person. It is more that I think "okay, the pic is nice, but I still could do better" without knowing what to change at all.

Acadia: May I ask what brings you to the idea that I do something else? This is not about getting more comments, I want to become better for ME and not because I might (or not) get a virtual "pat on my back".

hborre: thank you for the suggestion, I will check it out

ShawnDriscoll: I think I am big enough to handle leaving the bubble ;)

I understand it when people are in a rush and just write short comments, I am often myself too. That's why I ask here, when people may take/have more time :D.

What you say about people seen as competion makes me a bit sad though...competion can be good, but I have the feeling you mean it in a negative way.

I already was in an art class, which is by the way NOT the "key to artistic heaven"...

I just want the help to further progressing too and because I have no clue how, I need other opinions...

Okay, will do this, thanks.