Especially if you are rendering to disk and using anti-alising. I had some images really lose huge amounts of detail, before I started using multi-pass. I use it for all my images now. It does take a little longer to render, but it is definitely worth it. I got the advice from Jos Leys, who knows a little bit about Ultra Fractal... ~;o}

Hey, Zhann... Guess that depends on whose name is on the tuts. They would still carry any copyright on the info. We could probably track them down, if they are still around. I think most of the info was for Bryce 2 and 3D, but it still could be handy.

Attached Link: http://freepages.arts.rootsweb.com/~fractalis/artists/kod101.html

Hey, way too much negativity going on here. The review was not negative. It's tone was quite positive. True, it missed the mark on a couple of points, but you can study Bryce for years, and still find new things it will do. For someone who hasn't worked with Bryce since 1, I think the reviewer did an OK job. Gunther put the program through its paces and came up with a reiew that was wonderful, and way too long for anyone but a devout Brycer to read. We all have ideas about how Bryce could be improved. That our ideas are a little more informed goes without saying. That a near outsider came into our world, and tested Bryce 5 out, leaving with a positive experience is wonderful. That his review got trashed and he got hostility in return... not so nice. I love Bryce. I wish every review were perfect, but that ain't gonna happen. Just my two cents.